Yingluck ruling lays bare conservative hypocrisy

Listen to this story

The recent ruling by Thailand’s Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions to drop the case against former Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra is a significant development in Thai politics. Yingluck was accused of abusing her power in the transfer of Thawil Pliansri from his role as the secretary-general of the National Security Council to an adviser position in 2011. The court’s decision, underlining the lack of evidence against Yingluck, is not just a legal judgement but also a symbolic moment that compels a reevaluation of the longstanding conservative case against the Shinawatra family.

For years, the Shinawatras have been at the epicenter of Thailand’s turbulent political landscape. Yingluck’s brother, Thaksin Shinawatra, also a former prime minister, faced similar accusations and legal challenges. The consistent pattern of charges and the nature of the political discourse around these cases strongly suggest a narrative driven more by political motivations than by legal or ethical concerns. This narrative has been central to the conservative factions in Thailand, who have positioned themselves as champions of traditional values and national stability, often juxtaposed against the supposed corruption and mismanagement of the Shinawatras.

The crux of this conservative argument has been the alleged abuse of power and corruption within the Shinawatra administrations. However, the recent court ruling and the lack of concrete evidence in many of these cases raise serious questions about the validity of these accusations. The persistence of such charges, despite the frequent absence of substantive legal grounding, points towards a strategy aimed at discrediting and destabilizing the Shinawatra family’s political base, rather than addressing any genuine governance or legal failures.

More intriguing is the recent political realignment that sees the conservative factions, who have long vilified the Shinawatras, joining hands with them. This alliance, ostensibly a pragmatic move to consolidate political power, effectively dismantles the longstanding conservative narrative against the Shinawatras. It reveals an underlying opportunism and a willingness to eschew previously held moral and political stances for strategic gains. The implications of this realignment are profound, extending beyond the immediate political landscape and into the realm of political integrity and the credibility of the conservative factions.

This shift has particularly stark ramifications for the Move Forward Party, which now finds itself in opposition to a consolidated political force combining its erstwhile adversaries. The party, known for its progressive stance and appeal to younger voters, faces the challenge of navigating this new political reality, where the lines between former rivals have blurred. The realignment highlights a political opportunism that transcends ideological divides, underscoring a willingness among Thailand’s political elite to prioritize power over principle.

The dropping of the case against Yingluck Shinawatra and the subsequent political realignment in Thailand lay bare the motivations behind the long-standing conservative case against the Shinawatra family. This development not only questions the foundation of past political narratives but also reshapes the future course of Thai politics.

COVID-19

Ivermectin not effective in treating Covid-19, joint Mahidol-Oxford study shows

Ivermectin is not shown to be effective against Covid-19 in clinical trials according to the findings of a joint...

Latest article