Khun Srettha, it is time to declare a national health emergency over smog

Listen to this story

The escalating crisis of PM2.5 air pollution in Thailand has reached a critical juncture, demanding immediate and decisive action from the government led by Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin. The pervasive smog that blankets cities, particularly Bangkok and northern regions like Chiang Mai, poses not just an environmental threat but a dire public health emergency. With air quality indices frequently breaching safe levels, the question arises: Why has there been no significant government statement or action on this pressing issue? What measures are being taken by the Ministry of Agriculture to address the rampant agricultural burning contributing to this crisis?

The severity of PM2.5 pollution, characterized by particles small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream, cannot be overstated. Linked to a myriad of health problems including lung cancer, heart disease, and premature death, the pollution levels have led to increased hospital admissions, burdening the healthcare system and affecting the country’s productivity and economic vitality. The World Bank’s alarming revelation that PM2.5 pollution costs Thailand a staggering 6% in lost GDP annually underscores the urgency for action.

The recent overwhelming vote in Parliament for seven “clean air” laws signals a recognition of the issue’s gravity. However, legislation alone is insufficient without robust enforcement and a concerted effort to tackle the pollution sources head-on. The agricultural sector, a significant contributor to the smog through crop burning, requires urgent reform. The continued practice, despite its known impacts, raises critical questions about the Ministry of Agriculture’s role and the effectiveness of current policies.

The government must declare PM2.5 pollution a national health emergency and mobilize resources and policy mechanisms to combat it. This includes comprehensive public health advisories, substantial investment in sustainable agricultural practices to eliminate the need for crop burning, and stringent enforcement of pollution control measures. Moreover, the government’s silence and inaction send a disconcerting message about its commitment to public health and environmental stewardship.

The strategic transformation proposed by the Strategic Transformation Office (STO), including collaborative efforts to tackle the root causes of PM2.5 emissions and the introduction of economic incentives for cleaner practices, is a step in the right direction. However, these initiatives need to be accelerated and backed by the full weight of the government. Provincial governors should be empowered and held accountable for identifying and mitigating air-pollution zones within their jurisdictions.

Furthermore, the agricultural ministry must proactively engage with the farming community to transition away from harmful practices like open burning. Innovative solutions such as the FireD registration system for controlled crop burning represent a forward-thinking approach but require effective implementation and widespread adoption.

The situation calls for not just policy reform but a cultural shift towards environmental responsibility and sustainability. Public awareness campaigns, incentives for clean energy use, and investment in green infrastructure can catalyze this shift. It’s crucial for the government to lead this charge, demonstrating a commitment to safeguarding the health of its citizens and the integrity of its environment.

Inaction is no longer an option. The government of Srettha Thavisin must rise to the challenge, making air quality improvement a top priority. This involves transparent communication about the severity of the issue, immediate action plans, and a clear timeline for improvement. The health of Thailand’s people, the integrity of its environment, and the sustainability of its economy depend on it. It’s time for a clear, decisive, and unified response to the PM2.5 crisis—a response that leaves no room for ambiguity about the government’s priorities and its duty to protect its citizens.

COVID-19

Ivermectin not effective in treating Covid-19, joint Mahidol-Oxford study shows

Ivermectin is not shown to be effective against Covid-19 in clinical trials according to the findings of a joint...

Latest article